Hi everyone,
First, thank you for sharing this discussion : itâs very interesting and vital for the project
On my side, I have been a daily user of YunoHost since 2015 (personally and via Tera, the association where I am a volunteer almost full-time). I am unfortunately only a very small contributor (except to report issues), especially because of lack of time (difficult to add up voluntary work xD) and also lack of skills, but it means a lot to me to bring what I can to this great project
This issue of volunteer work is a tuff one, and we are going through the same problematic in our association. Etymologically, volunteer means âto want the goodâ. We have added the meaning âwithout being paidâ but I prefer to say âwithout waiting a compensationâ. So we (=the community, the society) can decide that volunteers who are doing an important work for the common good and should be paid for that (but in a free relationship).
YunoHost does seem to me a project working for the common good, and the people who contribute a significant part of their time to it would therefore fully deserve to be remunerated to ensure its sustainability and its development (for both the project and the people )
But how to do that in a world without a basic income ?
This notion of the common good is, in my opinion, also enlightening on the way to find funding.
And in this respect, option 3 seems to me to be a bad solution.
-
First, developing services to obtain remuneration (YNH turn-key instances, support, âŠ) seems to me not to fulfill the initial objective, in the sense that the paid time will be spent mainly to provide these services and not on YNH itself. But I think it would be great if theses services existed, but as a separate activity developed by those who want it.
-
Inevitably, I think that this option can lead to ethical issues (proprietary code?) and dependence on private entities that would fund features
I think that projects serving the common good should try to get out of this reciprocal relationship (money in exchange something) and be based on models of free participation.
Two examples (without mention Framasoft that everyone here should know about).
-
HelloAsso, which permits associations to manage their memberships, donations, to set up fundraising campaigns, all without any fees for the associations. For its own financing, HelloAsso applies much the same principle as it proposes to associations: donors have the possibility, in addition to their donation and on an optional basis, to contribute to HelloAsso in the form of a tip.
-
Our association: we have been operating on this model of free and conscious participation for several years, whether it is for the stays of our volunteers, the financing of some projects, the payment of training etc⊠For the moment it was to cover our expenses and some material investments, today it is also going to cover the financing of about ten half-time, (warning, disguised publicity !)
Allying option 1 and 2 seems to me to be the right vision, but we still have to put in place the strategy to achieve this
I see at least a few steps / ideas:
-
Create an association (loi 1901)
-
Be able to collect âtax exemptionâ donations. In my opinion, this is essential to be efficient. Itâs a huge lever.
-
Communicate, externally (to make the project known and find more funders) and especially internally (to encourage users to give). I remember Framasoft displaying a pop-in on their website explaining why itâs vital to give etc.) I think you have to be insistent enough without becoming too embarrassing or intrusive. We still have to figure out how. (Banners / pop-in on the YNH website, a persistent banner on the admin API?). The important thing is to be transparent: we need so much, we are at that point today, etc.)
I donât really know what your exact links with Framasoft are (and Iâd be curious to know them): partnership established? To come? Possibility to seek funds through their structure? (Interesting because they can collect âtax exemptionâ donations)
Another solution for tax exemption is to go through an endowment fund that allows it to tax exemption donations. This is what we do with Tera, and it would be quite possible that YunoHost also uses it, if you wish it.
From what Iâve read, obtaining the âAssociation reconnue dâutilitĂ© publiqueâ status is a long and not so easy process, itâs why I think you need to find another way to collect tax exemption donations in the meantime.
For public funds, itâs another story because itâs quite time-consuming in terms of paperwork (donât underestimate this time), but it can make it possible to recover a lot of money. I think you need someone who knows this world and is motivated to do it!
Long live to YunoHost